This blog post is a brief analysis of the film in relation to group dynamics. It can be viewed at this link: A man jury is sent to begin deliberations in the first-degree murder trial of an year-old Latino accused in the stabbing death of his father, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut:
The series seeks to explore leadership through the lens of selected movies.
I always recommend you watch the movie before reading the analysis so as not to spoil a great movie. The film, set in a New York City courthouse, tells the story of a twelve man jury at the trial of an 18 year old Hispanic boy from the slums on trail for murdering his father.
The film charts a fascinating journey of how each of the jurors, through careful argument and oftentimes heated discussion, turn around their decision and deliver a unanimous vote of not-guilty.
Authentic leadership is rooted in Greek philosophy. The term was coined by Robert Terry in but was popularised by Bill George. A prerequisite for being an authentic leader is knowing your own strengths, limitations, and values. Knowing what you stand for and what you value is critical. Moreover, self-awareness and awareness of the impact you have on others is needed in order to develop the other components of authentic leadership.
At the start of the movie, Davies stands by the window alone smoking a cigarette. He is thoughtful and reflective. This involves being honest and straightforward in dealing with others. An authentic leader does not play games or have a hidden agenda.
You know where you stand with an authentic leader as they openly express their thoughts and feelings In the movie, Davies is very honest and transparent about his position.
An effective authentic leader solicits opposing viewpoints and considers all options before choosing a course of action. Authentic leaders encourage others to question or challenge their values.
He uses powerful advocacy and inquiry skills and avoids making assumptions. An authentic leader has a self-regulated ethical core. They know the right thing to do and are driven by a concern for ethics and fairness executed through ethical decision making, judgement and behaviour. He is not driven by self-importance or entrenched position — at one stage when he feels too alienated from the group, he feels the right thing to do is to encourage others to do the right thing by abstaining on a secret ballot vote and promising to switch his position if there were still eleven votes for guilty.
He commands respect, when the bigot and the sadists talk, the other jurors move away; when Davies talks, they listenhe shifts entrenched views away from vengeance to justice, he encourages people to do the right thing and his actions deter a boy from being executed.
He comes across as compassionate, thoughtful, sincere and genuine, qualities which attract followership. In this fast-paced technological age where companies have folded because of unethical practice it is important to have some authentic leaders in the organisation to keep it focused on its core values and beliefs.
Analysis Of The Movie ' 12 Angry Men ' Essay - 12 Angry Men The movie “12 Angry Men” is about a child that is just about to be sentence to death penalty because he was suspicious of . The Midterm Elections are fast approaching. ABC News brings you in-depth coverage and breaking political news, as voters determine the Senate and House of Representatives. Titanic is a American epic romance and disaster film directed, written, co-produced and co-edited by James Cameron.A fictionalized account of the sinking of the RMS Titanic, it stars Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet as Jack and Rose–members of different social classes who fall in love aboard the ship during its ill-fated maiden voyage.. Cameron's inspiration for the film came from his.
Studying Davies, juror number eight, in the movie can help us appreciate the values, qualities and approach of an authentic leader. Look out for further articles in this series.12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
The first time I got to know about “12 Angry Men” was a few years back when I was reading one of the best books on kaja-net.com book mentioned an activity where readers were requested to watch this black and white classic on group dynamics.
Feb 07, · One of the greatest courtroom dramas ever made spends less than five minutes in the actual courtroom.
Sidney Lumet’s 12 Angry Men, the movie version of a celebrated teleplay by Reginald Rose, takes a riveting cast of stage, television, and film actors, places them in one set, and for ninety blissful minutes lets them bully and bluster, insinuate and pontificate, and generally hold forth in.
12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis. LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Twelve Angry Men, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
Reflection of American Society Justice. 12 Angry Men Movie Analysis Twelve Angry Men Analysis BA Reaching a unanimous vote, beyond a reasonable doubt, was a difficult task for the jurors represented in the film, 12 Angry Men.